You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Advocacy’ category.
Jeez, burnout sucks. And boy, was I feeling it last week. My blog post from last Friday accurately summed up the exhaustion, stress, feelings of defeat and the heaviness I was feeling as I flew back home. I didn’t even have the energy to yell ‘Bullshit!’ during the part of the safety video when the guy claims lies that there is great coffee to be had on the aircraft. That is just not true, Qantas.
Thanks to everyone who reached out – to everyone who Tweeted, Facebooked, Instagrammed, commented, texted and emailed. I did take a few days off SoMe, but when I logged back on, I read absolutely everything that was sent to me, and I am overwhelmed (but in a really good way) by everyone’s support.
I participated in yesterday’s #DSMA chat because the awesome Cherise thought that a community chat about advocacy burnout was a good idea, and as is Cherise’s way, she was right. I learnt a heap about how others manage the inevitable feelings of overwhelm that affect so many of us at one time or another.
I am incredibly fortunate to work in a place that truly values the lived experience. As I wrote in this piece after the Ascenisa #OzDSMS, my CEO has always not only valued my role in the organisations he has led, but has championed the importance of lived experience. I’m really glad he was able to speak to some of Australia’s most impressive advocates (all of whom he already knew) to continue to explain just how important the work they/we all are doing truly is. I held on to that for a lot of last week and over the weekend too.
But it was the support of those with diabetes that helped me dig deep to find the way out of the dark space; those who understand that special brand of burnout that we feel when not only has our own body done its best to undermine us, but others and circumstances around us pile on, making things just so damn hard.
There is an ever-increasing body of evidence that shows peer support is helpful to people living with health conditions. But there is so much more to why we become parts of these communities than to just improve our health and wellbeing, or to connect with others who ‘get it’.
In these communities, those advocacy efforts we are working on in our own little corners of the world become real and big. Heather Gabel wrote this awesome Twitter thread about frustrations I share with her about how we need to focus on the social change our communities create. I will always need the tea and sympathy, but I also need the connections with those world-changing folks whose drive, determination and dedication help me thrive.
I would be naïve to suggest for a moment that the devastating and crushing burnout I was feeling last week has disappeared. It’s still there, and I suspect it will be for some time, and I’m going to keep taking time out, and stepping back for a little bit longer. But I am far more motivated now, and the crappy things that culminated in feeling overwhelmed are starting to look like blips rather than insurmountable peaks. Thanks to everyone who helped me step back and refocus.
Window seat on a Qantas flight back to Melbourne after a busy few days at #ADC19 and to say that I am exhausted doesn’t touch the sides of how I am really feeling. It’s been a busy conference, but then, when are conferences not busy? I’ve spoken to a lot of people, sat in a lot of meetings, heard a lot of sessions. But that’s just the usual way conferences go.
My exhaustion started before I even got in a cab to the airport on Monday. And really, that exhaustion isn’t just about the sore legs, the lack of sleep or the mental overload of trying to digest stats and presentations, or wandering around a huge conference centre.
I’m so burnt out right now. Not diabetes-wise; advocacy wise. I’m weary. And I feel so, so beaten that I almost ache. I feel like I am at the edge of tears a lot of the time because everything feels like such an effort.
This is a challenge when working in, while living with, diabetes. Even when my diabetes is impacting as minimally as I could ever hope it to (thanks to the Loop god/esses again), the big world of diabetes is there in a way that, at times, crushes me. I used to feel like this a lot more when I had to spend so much time justifying to co-workers the value and importance of the work I and my team were doing. That’s not the case now, but there are still times that it all does feel like it is too much.
And when I feel like this, things that usually would barely be a blip on the radar are weighing me down. I usually am ready to take on whatever is thrown at me, or whatever I see that needs the PWD voice to interject, but right now that actually feels like a burden. A relentless burden where my efforts are misfiring or yielding hardly any benefit. The fire that is usually ignited in my belly feels like instead of fuelling my enthusiasm and passion is instead giving me heartburn.
Right now, being in this advocacy space is making me feel hopeless. I know that there are always allies that truly do believe in what I believe in – the value of the PWD, the need for us to be heard, the value and vastness of our experience and expertise.
But the voices of those who don’t necessarily feel that way are especially loud at the moment. It’s the HCPs who still (STILL?) question the right for PWD to be wandering around and on the stage at diabetes conferences, the comments about how the value our lived experience doesn’t equal the weight of scientific evidence, the messaging that I keep seeing everywhere I turn that misrepresents diabetes and actually does PWD a disservice. It’s the idea that others think they can dictate to PWD how we need to see the safe places we have created, or tell us that because they can’t back up with data when we say a technology, or a service or a program helps us, it is not valid or deserves funding. It is being confronted constantly online and offline and at every opportunity, when really, if we say we feel a certain way about living with diabetes, we actually do have the right to have that unchallenged.
And right now, I don’t seem to have the energy to try to counter that.
I tried to explain to someone the other day why I rarely let something that I see as being negative towards PWD go by. I know that it would be easier to ignore a lot of the crap and let it just slip by. I know that being angry is tiring. But that isn’t enough for me to not respond.
Usually, I have the resilience and robustness to address whatever the issue, and then whatever gets thrown back at me. I don’t think that I am the only one who can do this, but I do know that often I am one of the few people who actually is at the table while it is happening. Once, where I was the only PWD in a meeting of HCPs someone told me that I didn’t need to have an opinion on everything and I pointed out that actually, as the only PWD in the room when others were making negative comments, I actually do. And that it was in my position description, so I was simply doing my job.
I am tired. I really am.
Having my tribe around me this week has helped – it always does. But even with this support, and the laughs and the knowing looks and the understanding, I’m feeling beaten. (I am so grateful to have had them around this week…I’m not sure how I would have otherwise coped…)
I know it’s a phase but this time I don’t know how to locate the strength I need to get back to where I like to be. Or to push down the doubt and imposter syndrome that shoots up alongside this sort of advocacy burnout. That’s what happens – just as with diabetes burnout – we start to second guess out efforts and wonder if what we are doing is enough or really has any point. There is a point – I know that. There has to be. Because the personal investment is vast and really, there is no other choice but to keep on keeping on.

Grateful for my tribe.
Sometimes, something happens at a diabetes conference that I need to sit on for a while before I can write or talk about it. At ADA this year (almost six weeks ago now), there was a moment that has stuck with me and I think it’s time to talk about it.
I was sitting in the front row of the language session – because, of course I was – eager to hear from the all-star panel that was going to be looking at the language issues from the perspective of the PWD and HCP, as well as look at the role HCPs play in addressing diabetes stigma and how they can improve communication. I loved the well-rounded approach the session was taking, and settled in for a couple of hours of discussion.
The line-up was a veritable A-list of the best voices in the space. We had ‘Jane squared’, with Dickinson and Speight book-ending the program, Joe Solowiejczyk giving the consumer side and Kevin Joiner providing strategies for dismantling stigma.
Jane Dickinson has been an absolute champion of the diabetes #LanguageMatters movement in the US. And it was in her introductory session that the moment of today’s post happened. Jane was speaking about how HCPs see diabetes and people living with the condition. And she showed this slide:

I can’t remember if Jane read out the quotes. But I do remember how I felt as I read them and took in what they meant. I felt beaten.
As people living with diabetes, so many of us have firsthand experience of hearing these sorts of comments directed to us. Or we have had friends with diabetes tell us their tales. Or we have heard passing comments from HCPs expressing similar sentiments. The idea that we don’t care, have brought it all on ourselves, deserve what we have coming – and conversely, don’t deserve care – us pervasive through the diabetes landscape.
This is how diabetes and those of us are living with it are perceived. And it is heartbreaking.
There is no consistency as to who is making these comments – healthcare professionals from all different disciplines, at different stages of their careers, with different experiences. Some work in tax-funded settings, others in private settings. They are considered the best in their field, they are held up as examples of excellent care. Other HCPs refer PWD to them.
Often, I hear people say that these attitudes are really only ever the thoughts of ’old school’ HCPs who have been around for a long time; it’s a throwback to the patriarchal attitudes of healthcare – to days when doctor or nurse knows best and ‘patient’ does what they are told, and if they don’t, they get told off, while being written off as not caring for themselves.
But that assessment is actually not true at all. Some of the most sensitive and tuned-in HCPs I know have been working in diabetes for many, many years.
And some are yet to have even started their career. In exactly the same way that diabetes doesn’t discriminate, it seems that these horrid attitudes and stigmatising comments can come from people at every stage of their career.
Here is the whole slide.

That’s right. These comments came from future nurses. They hadn’t even set foot on the wards yet as qualified HCPs. But somehow, their perceptions of people with diabetes were already negative, and so full of bias. Already, they have a seed planted that is going to grow into a huge tree of blaming and shaming. And the people they are trusted to help will be made to feel at fault and as though they deserve whatever comes their way.
This – THIS – is why I am not stopping banging on about language and diabetes. THIS is why I get frustrated when someone responds to – and reduces – a discussion about this issue with ‘But I/my kid is happy to be called (a) diabetic’. THIS is why I constantly highlight when people or organisations or people in the media are using stigmatising or negative language.
The words we use shape the attitudes we have, and the attitudes held by many about diabetes are disgraceful. Imagine if instead of mindsets like this, HCPs came out of their training with the idea that people with diabetes need support, education, information, compassion and skills to best manage a condition that no one, but no one, ever asked for Just think about how different – and better – that could be.
The ADA session ended perfectly – with Jane Speight (my personal diabetes #LanguageMatters hero) playing the Mytonomy ‘Changing the Conversation’ video. So, here’s that video again. Watch it. Share it.
Language matters. I feel I’ve said it so many times, and yet I still have people asking me why it is so important. So, I’m revisiting this post from just over twelve months ago which explains just how the words we use to talk about diabetes has an incredible flow on effect. Read on…
I had a great conversation the other day with someone who was interested to talk about diabetes and language with me. ‘I’m trying to get a better grasp of why it’s something so important to you, because, quite frankly, I couldn’t care less what people say about diabetes.’
This isn’t the first time people have asked me this. And it’s certainly not the first time I’ve been asked why I spend so much time speaking about diabetes language matters.
I know the reasons, but to be perfectly honest, I’m not sure that I have them especially well mapped out when I need to explain them. So, let me try here.
There is a tangled and complicated link between the words used when talking about diabetes, and how we feel about it and how diabetes is perceived by others. That link then goes off on all sorts of LA-freeway-like tangents to include diabetes and stigma, and discrimination.
The effects of how we frame diabetes can be felt by us individually. But they can also be far reaching and affect how others feel about diabetes.
We know that language has the potential to make people with diabetes feel judged and stigmatised. In fact, most PWD I know have at some time or another faced someone speaking to them using Judgey McJudgeface words. Of course, we all respond differently to this. For some people, it’s water off a duck’s back. They couldn’t care less what people say and just ignore it. For others, it’s almost a challenge – they use it as motivation to prove that they ‘won’t be beaten’.
But that’s not the case for everyone. For some people, it can be absolutely paralysing.
Fear of being judged and shamed may lead to some PWD to not wanting to attend HCP appointments and, as a consequence, falling behind on complication screening. Some PWD may not even tell their loved ones they have diabetes for fear of being judged. I have met PWD who made the decision to keep their diabetes a secret and for years, not telling another person. This can add to feelings of terrible isolation.
When diabetes is spoken about in stigmatising and demeaning ways, this leads to the spreading of misinformation. And this can have far reaching consequences.
We know that kids with diabetes may be teased by their schoolmates. Their teachers may not respond appropriately to diabetes because of the way diabetes is framed in the media or by others. We can’t really blame teachers. If diabetes is punchline fodder for every B-grade comedian, or an excuse to point fingers at those living with it by every tabloid news outlet, how can we expect anyone to take it seriously?
(And if right now you are thinking ‘This is why we need to change the name of type 1 diabetes’, stop it! People with type 1 diabetes shouldn’t be teased or mocked or judged, but neither should people with type 2 diabetes. This isn’t about people understanding the differences between type 1 and type 2 – this about understanding diabetes.)
The language we use when talking about prevention in diabetes – whether it be preventing type 2 diabetes or preventing diabetes-related complications – means that there is an underlying idea that developing type 2, or complications must be the fault of the individual. ‘If you can prevent it and haven’t, it’s your fault. You obviously lived an unhealthy lifestyle/are lazy/didn’t listen to your doctor/failed to follow instructions/refused to do what you were told etc.’.Can you imagine hearing that, or feeling that is what people think about you – all the time? This is the language – these are the words – used to talk about diabetes.
A couple of weeks ago in the UK, it was Prevent Diabetes Week. I saw countless tweets from people urging, begging, pleading with others to remember that type 1 diabetes can’t be prevented and the week refers only to type 2 diabetes. I wonder if those tweeting realised that comments such as these actually contribute to the stigma associated with type 2 diabetes? Of course type 1 diabetes can’t be prevented. But in many cases, neither can type 2 diabetes. There are so many non-modifiable factors associated with a type 2 diagnosis – factors beyond the control of the individual.
But let’s look beyond individuals, the health system and the education system for a moment. What else happens in other settings when diabetes is spoken about in stigmatising ways?
Health organisations, including diabetes organisations, frequently seek donations from the public to continue the important work they do. There is only so much money in the donation pie, and yet there are more and more competing organisations representing people with different health conditions wanting a piece of that pie.
Donations are harder to come by from the general community when there is the idea – the wrong idea – that diabetes is a largely preventable lifestyle condition that is the fault of those diagnosed. There is not the idea that people who have developed cancer brought it on themselves, even though we know that some of the risk factors associated with a breast cancer diagnosis are the same as for type 2 diabetes.
Research dollars for diabetes are far less than for other health conditions. We see that every year when successful NHMRC grants are announced. Diabetes is the poor cousin to cancer research and CVD research.
Diabetes is just as serious as any other condition that is worthy of research dollars and fundraising dollars. Yet because of the way we speak about it and the way diabetes as a condition has been framed, there is a perception that perhaps it isn’t.
Words matter. Language matters.
So, what I want to say to people who think that talking about language and words is a first world problem that only occupies the minds of the privileged is this: I acknowledge my privilege. But this isn’t simply about words. It’s about perception.
Until diabetes is considered the same way as other conditions that are taken seriously and thought of as blameless, the trickle-down effect is people with diabetes will continue to feel stigma. Diabetes will continue to be the poor cousin of other health conditions and diseases because there is the misconception it is not as serious. People will not as readily make donations towards fundraising initiatives. Research dollars will continue to fall short, instead going towards ‘more worthy’ conditions.
That’s why I care so much about diabetes language. Because, language matters… so much.




It’s great that a number of PWD already know that they will be part of ATTD this year, attending satellite events run by different device and drug companies. Some are on the program and some will be there through other opportunities and work.


























