You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Communication’ category.
Diabetes stigma is a hot button topic in the diabetes world. It has been for some time. I wrote just last month how stigma was one of the most talked about issues at ADA. That week, we also launched an Open Letter from the Diabetes Community, asking health professionals to join us in our call to stop diabetes stigma.
And behind the scenes, for all of this year, another exciting, BIG, project has been hatching and I’m so excited to share it today.
Earlier this year, in an unprecedented show of unity and determination, a group of 51 experts from 18 countries joined forces to pool our lived, research and clinical experience to address diabetes stigma and discrimination. Together, we’ve reviewed the scientific evidence and established an international consensus on 49 Statements of Evidence and Recommendations. The full report on this review has been submitted and is currently under review.
Excitingly, the group also reached a consensus on a Pledge dedicated to bringing an end to diabetes stigma and discrimination. And that’s where you come in! Everyone can sign to show your commitment stop the ingrained negative judgments, stereotypes, and prejudices that influence attitudes about diabetes, and contribute to the stigma so many of us face. This isn’t just for the community. We know there is sometimes an echo chamber as we say the same things to each other, over and over. We also know that while diabetes stigma is indeed prevalent within our community, we also need to tell the story of its harm outside the diabetes world.
Well, here’s an easy way to do both. Please sign the pledge and share details across your social platforms. You can sign as an individual, and we’d also love for you to see if your place of work, school, community group, hospital, church, sporting team, favourite cafe…basically anywhere that is likely to come into contact with people with diabetes (i.e. literally everyone!) would be interested in signing too.
This is a true community effort, with involvement from stakeholders from across the diabetes landscape, across the world. You won’t see logos anywhere, because this for and about all people with diabetes. The names of the people involved in the work so far is on the website.
Are you with us?
A few weeks ago, I saw a post on LinkedIn from Nick Dawson. Nick was around Twitter health communities a lot when I first joined and it was great to read his post and take a wander down Twitter’s memory lane.
The feeling of nostalgia was strong. I don’t remember joining Twitter, but I do remember when I started actually using it to connect with others with diabetes from around the globe and how my diabetes world suddenly seemed infinitely bigger. No longer was I constrained to only people in my own networks, or even my own country. I was a global citizen in the diabetes online world. And it felt great.
Twitter became the cornerstone of a lot of my own advocacy and connections online. I never missed a weekly #DSMA tweet chat, expertly moderated by Cherise Shockley. The rapid fire hour of diabetes power often included hundreds of people. Dana Lewis’ #HCSM weekly chats brought together from different health communities, opening my eyes not only to different healthcare struggles, but also to solutions that helped me with my own diabetes. I used Twitter to find people who were doing incredible things that elevated the voice of people with diabetes. It was on Twitter that I followed along with the first Roche blogger summit that brought together US social media pioneers. I used those sorts of events to shape the Australian Social Media Summit that was held at the end of 2012, coordinated by Diabetes Victoria, bringing together Australian diabetes social media folk and Kerri Sparling from the US.
I was part of the team that started the weekly #OzDOC tweet chats in July 2012, working with Cherise to help get things started close to home. Around the same time, the first #GBGoc tweet chat happened and the first #dedoc° chat, #FRDoc and #ItDOC followed soon after. Back then, those chats were brilliant at highlighting local issues, but by and large, they were indeed global.
Twitter was the tool I used to take notes at conferences, live tweeting sessions to share with those not in the room, and then pulling the information together in briefing documents at works, and writing articles here and on other platforms. And Twitter was the channel where remarkable whole community events happened. Remember Kelly Kunik’s #IWishPeopleKnewThatDiabetes and those #DayOfDiabetes discussions? Or the groundbreaking and overwhelming community event that was #Simonpalooza? It was peer support on demand. There was no need to feel alone with your diabetes if you were on Twitter!
And then, I don’t know when, Twitter changed. Or I changed. Or the community changed. It became harder to find the people who had shone so brightly and made Twitter a place of support and community. I stuck close to old friends who never advertised the Twitter following count, because who cared? I learnt the difference between an advocate and an influencer. And I started to steer completely clear of parts of the community which was so alien to what it had been like when I first joined. #DSMA chats became less frequent because Twitter chats became kind of old hat. #OzDOC chats completely stopped because there hadn’t been a sustainability plan in place and there really wasn’t anyone to take over. Perhaps this was a reflection of how the community wanted to engage and what they…what we…wanted.
For me, most of the day-to-day reaching out I used Twitter for moved to being via private channels. And that worked fine and became the same lifeline that the public space Twitter had once been.
There have absolutely been some bangers recently that have made me remember how great Twitter can be. The weekly #DiabetesChat, using Spaces, launched a new community that, although based in the UK, was very much global. Tom and the organisers went out of their way to include people from other places around the world to be interviewed and lead discussions. I loved it straight away for the beautiful open and welcome feeling that was there and embraced it. #dedoc° isn’t really a Twitter based organisation, but the #dedoc° voices use it brilliantly, and diabetes conference are so visible because of their prolific sharing.
In the last few days, a new Twitter-like app called Threads has been launched and I tentatively signed up and had a nosy look around. It felt like Twitter in 2012. Friendly. Fun. Open. I’ve found Threads friends (thriends?) who I’ve not seen around the Twitter traps for years and have re-engaged. I’ve managed to steer clear from the parts of diabetes Twitter that I’ve actively avoided over recent years.
It’s not perfect. There needs to be an option for people to add ALT text to photos, because that’s not there yet. Apparently it is coming. (But, you know, accessibility should have been a first level consideration, not an after thought…) A desktop version would be useful – it’s annoying only having the option to type on a phone keypad. The lack of hashtags is annoying. (Just today, I went back and read the tweets from that first Australian social media summit by searching the hashtag. What a treasure trove!) Again, this is said to be on the cards. As is the capability to see only threads from people you’re following rather than the mishmash right now. Having said that, sprinkled in amongst the predominantly diabetes focused threads I’ve been seeing, I’m not too disappointed with the cat pics, recipes and book recommendations that I’m seeing a lot of. Also pleasing is that I’ve managed to avoid so much as a hint of the crappy, manipulative, misogynist side of the diabetes world that clouded my Twitter experience for a while before I worked out how to block it out completely.
Is this the future of Twitter? Over here on this new app? Threads feels like the nostalgia Nick wrote about. It really does feel like the ghost of Twitter past and I like it a whole lot more than the ghouls of Twitter present. Come and visit if you’re not there already. I’m @RenzaS and you’ll see me sharing diabetes stuff, pet photos, books. And asking people about their diabetes experiences to help me make sense of my own. I hope to see you there!
All too frequently, when talking about meaningful lived experience engagement, I hear about ‘Hard to Reach Communities’. A number of years ago, I called rubbish on that, putting a stop to any discussion that used the term as a get out of jail free card to excuse lack of diversity in lived experience perspectives.
‘People with type 2 diabetes don’t want to be case studies’ or ‘Young people with diabetes don’t respond to our call outs for surveys’ or ‘People from culturally and linguistically diverse communities won’t share their stories’ or ‘Folks in rural areas don’t come to our events’. These are just some real life examples I heard when asking why there was no diversity in the stories I was seeing.
See how the blame there is all on the people with diabetes? They don’t want, don’t respond, won’t share, won’t attends. It’s them. They’re the problem. It’s them.
I stood on stage at EASD in Stockholm last year and challenged the audience to stop using the term ‘hard to reach’. Because that’s not the case at all. The truth is that in most cases, the same old, uninventive methods are always employed. And those methods only work for a very narrow segment of the community.
I recently heard someone begrudge that all applicants who responded to a recent call out for a new committee were the same: white, had type 1 diabetes, city-dwelling. ‘Of course they are,’ I said. ‘That’s the group that loves a community advisory council and responds to an expression of interest call out on socials. They are able to attend meetings when they are scheduled, are confident to speak up and are willing to share their story, because they probably have before and received positive feedback for doing so Plus, they’re expecting everyone else at the table will look and sound just like them.’
But the lack of diversity isn’t the problem of the people who didn’t respond. It’s the problem of whoever is putting out a call and expecting people to reply because that’s how it’s Always Been Done.
This was a discussion at a meeting during last week’s American Diabetes Association Scientific Sessions. The #dedoc° voices were meeting with the ADA’s Chief Scientific Officer, Dr Bob Gabbay, and Vice President in Science & Health Care, Dr Nicole Johnson. The question about how to reach a broad audience was asked. At #dedoc°, efforts have been made to attract a diverse group of people to our scholarship program, and have, to a degree there as been some success. A glance at any one of the #docday° events, or scholarship alumni will see people who had not previously been given a platform within the diabetes community. But there is always more than can be done.
The discussion in that meeting at ADA mirrored many that happened throughout the week. And it’s not surprising that US diabetes advocate Chelcie Rice came up with the perfect way to explain how to do better at engaging with the who have previously been dismissed as ‘hard to reach’. He said: ‘You can’t just put pie in the middle of the table. Deliver the pie to where they are.’ And he’s right. Those tried and true methods that work for only one narrow segment of the community have been all about putting pie in the middle of the table, knowing that there will be some people ready with a plate and a fork. But a lot of people are not already at the table, or comfortable holding out their plate. Or maybe they don’t even like that pie. But we never find out because no effort is really made.
Chelcie once said ‘If you’re not given a seat at the table, bring your own chair‘ and I’ve repeated that quote dozens, if not hundreds of times. And his words ring very true for people like me who have felt very comfortable dragging my own chair, and one for someone else and insisting that others scramble to make room for us. But that metaphorical table isn’t enough anymore. Not everyone wants to sit at a table and we need to stop expecting that. Instead, it’s time to find people where they are – the places, the settings, the environments they feel comfortable and at home. That’s how you do engagement.
On day 2 of the American Diabetes Association Scientific Sessions, rushing between meetings, I overhead another attendee say this: ‘I’ve never heard so many people talking about diabetes stigma’. I turned to them, a bright smile on my face and said, ‘I know, right?’, (a phrase I only ever utter when I’m in the US).
Just a few hours earlier, Jazz Sethi and I had tweeted simultaneously, setting free an open letter from the diabetes community about diabetes-related stigma. You may have seen it; thousands of people have. And others have shared, commented and even translated it into different languages (I think we’re at 6 translations and counting). Here it is!
When we first asked advocates from the community if they would like to add their logo to the letter we were surprised by the quick response. Almost everyone we went to said yes. We hadn’t gone out too widely – we wanted to test the waters first. The first version of the open letter includes advocates and peer support groups from across the world. Amazing!
And after our very low-key, (i.e. a couple of tweets from unverified Twitter accounts, so who knows what the algorithm did with them!), we were once again inundated by people asking for us to add their logos. (We haven’t managed to add them yet, but absolutely will in coming weeks. Please give us time if you’ve shared your logo. We’ll get there. And I’ll update this post with the new final page when that happens.)
There is something magic about these sorts of very grassroots, very community, very inclusive initiatives. Not only are they great because they collaboratively offer a narrative from people with diabetes, highlighting an issue that is of great importance to many. They also show you just how powerful and united our community is while also pointing to individuals and groups who are keen to work together, support each other and power the importance of lived experience. And that’s pretty special!
Imagine a community where people come together to make things happen. You don’t have to look far, really. Just look at the diabetes community!
Here’s something new from some folks (Jazz Sethi, me and Partha Kar) who are desperately trying to reshape the way diabetes is spoken about, and how fortunate I feel to have been involved in this project!
The thinking behind these particular language resources is to truly centre the person with diabetes when thinking about communication about the condition. In this series, we’ve highlighted three groups where we know (because these are the discussions we see in the diabetes community) language can sometimes be stigmatising and judgemental. This isn’t a finger-pointing exercise. Rather it’s an opportunity to highlight how to make sure that the words, images, body language – all communication – doesn’t impact negatively on people with diabetes.
A massive thanks to Jazz and Partha. Working together, and with the community, to create and get these out there has been a joy. (As was sneaking into the ATTD Exhibition Hall before opening time so we could get a coffee and find a comfortable seat to work before the crowds made their way in!) And a super extra special nod to Jazz who pulled together the design and made our words look so bright pretty! And a super, super, super special thanks to Jazz for designing my new logo which is getting its first run on the back of these guides.
You can access these and share directly from the Language Matters Diabetes website. These don’t belong to anyone other than the diabetes community, so please reach out if you would like to provide any commentary or be involved in future efforts. There’s always more to do!
There’s been quite a bit of discussion after yesterday’s post about a recent consultation I did with a creative agency looking to develop a campaign about diabetes-related complications. I try to be solutions oriented and offer ideas, rather than just swoop in and be critical, so with that in mind, I’ve put together a couple of checklists that may be of some assistance when thinking about ways to talk about complications.
Of course, as always, these are just my suggestions and others may completely disagree with them, or having more to add. But this is a start that can be considered, shared and built on. And it comes with the ever present reminder that people with diabetes deserve to see themselves represented in ways that don’t make us want to run for the hills or hide under the doona (duvet) and never come out. That’s always a really good place to start!
‘What would the ideal campaign about diabetes complications look like?’
What a loaded question, I thought. I was in a room full of creative consultants who wanted to have a chat with me about a new campaign they had been commissioned to develop. I felt like I was being interrogated. I was on one side of a huge table in a cavernous boardroom and opposite me, sat half a dozen consultants with digital notepads, dozens of questions, and eager, smiley looks on their faces. And very little idea of what living with diabetes is truly about, or just how fraught discussions about diabetes complications can be.
I sighed. I already had an idea of what their campaign would look like. I knew because more than two decades working as a diabetes advocate means I’ve seen a lot of it before.
‘Well,’ I started circling back to their question. ‘Probably nothing like what you have on those storyboards over there’. I indicated to the easels that had been placed around the room, each holding a covered-over poster. The huge smiles hardened a little.
Honestly, I have no idea why I get invited to these consultations. I make things very hard for the people on the other side of the table (or Zoom screen, or panel, or wherever these discussions take place).
I suppose I get brought in because I am known for being pretty direct and have lots of experience. And I don’t care about being popular or pleasing people. There is rarely ambiguity in my comments, and I can get to the crux of issue very quickly. Plus, consulting means getting paid by the hour and I can sum things up in minutes rather than an afternoon of workshops, and that means they get me in and out of the door without needing to feed me. I think the industry term for it is getting more bang for their buck.
I suggested that we start with a different question. And that question is this: ‘How do you feel when it is time for a diabetes complication screening’.
One of the consultants asked why that was a better question. I explained that it was important to understand just how people feel when it comes to discussions about complications and from there, learn how people feel when it’s time to be screened for them.
‘The two go hand in hand. I mean, if you are going to highlight the scary details of diabetes complications, surely you understand that will translate into people not necessarily rushing to find out more details.’
I told them the story I’ve told hundreds of times before – the story of my diagnosis and the images I was shown to convey all the terrible things that my life had in store now. Twenty-five years later, dozens and dozens of screening checks behind me, and no significant complication diagnosis to date, and yet, the anxiety I feel when I know it’s time for me to get my kidneys screened, or my eyes checked sends me into a spiral of fret and worry that hasn’t diminished at all over time. In fact, if anything, it has increased because of the way that we are reminded that the longer we have diabetes, the more likely we are to get complications. There is no good news here!
‘But people aren’t getting checked. They know they should, and they don’t. And some don’t know they need to. Or even that there are complications,’ came the reply from the other side of the table.
Now it was me whose face hardened.
‘Let’s unpack that for a moment,’ I said. ‘You have just made a very judgemental statement about people with diabetes. I don’t do judgement in diabetes, but if you want to lay blame, where should it lie? If you’re telling me that people don’t know they need to get checked or that there are diabetes complications, whose fault is that?’
I waited.
‘Blaming people or finding fault does nothing. That’s not going to help us here. You’ve been tasked to develop something that informs people with diabetes about complications – scary, terrifying, horrible, often painful – complications. Do you really want to open that discussion by blaming people?’
Yes, I know that not everyone with diabetes knows all about complications, and there genuinely are people out there who do not fully understand why screening is important, or what screening looks like. The spectrum of diabetes lived experience means there are people with a lot of knowledge and people with very little. But regardless of where people sit on that spectrum, complications must be spoken about with sensitivity and care.
The covers came off the posters around the room, and I was right. I’d seen it all before. There were stats showing rates of complications. More stats of how much complications cost. More stats of how many people are not getting screened for complications. More stats showing how complications can be prevented if only people got screened.
‘Thanks, I hate it,’ I thought to myself silently.
I spent the next half an hour tearing to shreds everything on those storyboards. We talked about putting humanity into the campaign and remembering that people with diabetes are already dealing with a whole lot, and adding worry and mental burden is not the way to go. I reminded them that telling us again and again and again, over and over and over the awful things that will happen to us is counterproductive. It doesn’t motivate us. It doesn’t encourage us to connect with our healthcare team. And it certainly doesn’t enamour us to whoever it is behind the campaign.
I wrapped my feedback in a bow and sent a summary email to the consultants the following day, emphatically pointing out that I am only one person with diabetes and that my comments shouldn’t be taken as gospel. Rather they should speak with lots of people with diabetes to get a sense of how many people feel. I urged them again to resist using scare tactics, or meaningless statistics. I reminded them that all aspects of the campaign – even those that might not be directed at people with diabetes – will be seen by us and we will be impacted by it. I asked that they centre people with diabetes in their work about diabetes.
But mostly, I reminded that anything to do with complications has real implications for people with diabetes. What may be a jaunt in the circus of media and PR for creative agencies is our real life. And our real life is not a media stunt.
Disclosure
I operate a freelance health consultancy. I was paid for this work because my expertise, just as the expertise of everyone with lived experience, is worth its weight in gold and we should be compensated (i.e. paid!) for it.
Four weeks. That’s about how long ago it was that the first murmurings of Fiasp being withdrawn from the PBS were heard in the Australian diabetes community.
It’s been a pretty wild ride in those four weeks, hasn’t it? I never should be surprised at the dedication and never-say-die attitude of diabetes communities, but what we saw from the Australian community was next level! And it went beyond that, with Aussie advocates rallying our friends from overseas (hello #dedoc° Voices!) to amplify our efforts here.
And today, news of a reprieve. Fiasp would be available on the PBS for another 6 months for anyone with a script dated prior to 1 April 2023. (That’s the catch – you need a script before that date, or you will have to pay the private prescription cost.)
This is a great result. It gives everyone with diabetes using Fiasp some breathing space to make plans for what happens if we need to change insulins.
There are a lot of beautiful things about grassroots advocacy. Firstly, it can be incredibly responsive. It takes just one person to share, and the community response is often instantaneous.
We saw that here, didn’t we. As soon as it was just a hint about what was going on with Fiasp, people with diabetes in Australia took to it. This was even before the Minister’s office was aware of what was happening! From a petition (amazing, Belinda!), blog posts and discussions in social media groups, to standing around conference exhibition halls (this is exactly what was going on at ATTD with Aussie advocates!) the momentum started and picked up speed.
It is undeniable that the best results happen when everyone works together, and as I said in my post about this issue a couple of weeks ago, …Community advocacy is often the starting point of rumblings that, combined with strong advocacy from diabetes organisations, leads to policy change.
This is a dazzling example of exactly that! A community of all stakeholders coming together, led by community. Doesn’t THAT make you feel all warm and fuzzy? And today, people with diabetes have celebrated in great ways – the people who should be centred in this win for their efforts. This was my tweet about that earlier today:
Some final thoughts
Celebrate the win and cheer with other community advocates. I’ve loved seeing the commentary in online community groups today! Our celebrations are so meaningful because it is our fridges that were going to be bare of Fiasp if this didn’t come through!!
I know it’s tempting to stockpile, but please don’t! There are 14,000 Australians using Fiasp and hopefully everyone who needs to get a script filled over the next six months will be able to do so effortlessly. Of course there is the human urge to make sure we don’t run out but remember that if you have a year’s supply in the fridge, that might mean someone can’t get their next week’s supply.
This isn’t done yet! Six months is AWESOME but keep the pressure up with the grassroots efforts that worked this time.
I don’t know when it was that I decided that I wasn’t fighting diabetes anymore. Maybe it had something to do with paying more attention to language and words, or maybe it was just accepting that no matter what the strategy, no matter how much I fight, diabetes is there.
Everywhere I turn in the diabetes world, I see words that invoke battle. It is, quite frankly, exhausting. We use terms like warrior, fighter and army and challenger. We are urged to fight the good fight and battle to beat everything diabetes throws at us.
But if this is a war, I was enlisted with no option of being a conscientious objector. I feel defeated a lot of the time because no matter how much I fight, diabetes is still here, coming at me. An in range A1c, or high percentage TIR, or screening check that comes back with ‘no changes’ doesn’t mean I’ve overcome diabetes. Diabetes remains, despite what the metrics say.
We’ve all read legends and seen enough movies to know that there are winners and losers in battles and wars. And understand the good guys are meant to win. But there is no defeating diabetes. It is always going to be there. Does that make me a loser? Does that make me the bad guy?
When I started to examine the militarised language in diabetes, I realised that those very words and ideas that I’m sure were meant to motivate ended up doing the exact opposite. How was it that despite all my efforts in the trenches – and my dogged, gritty determination – I still found myself just as challenged by diabetes as when the battle started? In fact, in some ways, I felt more challenged. I wasn’t advancing in ways that made me feel like I was heading to victory. Instead, it just felt like a static, never-ending, Groundhog Day of lather, rinse, repeat (or check, bolus, repeat).
Asking me to fight puts the responsibility – more responsibility – squarely on me and me alone. How unfair that rhetoric about diabetes requires more from us.
To be at war with diabetes is to be at war with myself. I can’t divorce myself from my diabetes – it is me and I am it. We are a tag team, a group package, a two-for-one deal. I don’t get a say in that, and no one else does either, no matter how much they implore me to fight.
It’s not a battle with diabetes that I need. In fact, it’s the complete opposite. It’s finding peace. That’s what I want to work towards – a peaceful existence that doesn’t add more burden.
If you google the words ‘diabetes public health campaign’, you will find myriad offerings from around the world. There are the good, the bad and the outright ugly. (Click on links at your own peril.) And many of these campaigns are the foundation of broader messaging about diabetes.
Why is it so hard to get messaging about diabetes right, and how do we fix years of getting it wrong?
The vast majority of type 2 diabetes messaging focuses on personal responsibility. It could be about losing weight, losing centimetres off your waist circumference, eating more fresh fruits and vegetables, being more active … you name it, it’s up to YOU.
It’s not just type 2 diabetes. Messaging aimed at addressing specific diabetes-related complications for all brands of diabetes also has a strong focus on personal responsibility: get screened/talk to your HCP/don’t miss appointments/don’t bury your head in the sand/look after yourself. The implication is that all accountability lies at the hands of the person with diabetes.
There are so many assumptions and that is one reason the messaging really hasn’t worked. There are more reasons, of course, and these are complex, multifaceted, and convoluted. You can almost understand why going with the easy ‘fix yourself’ messages are the ones that have been used.
The thinking behind so much of what we think and do about diabetes is misguided because too often we look to apply solutions that are medical in nature when we need to be considering social solutions. In a recently published New York Times article, writer Roni Caryn Rabin suggested a need to reframe (type 2 ) diabetes ‘…as a social, economic and environmental problem, and offer[s] a series of detailed fixes, ranging from improving access to healthy food and clean water to rethinking the designs of communities, housing and transportation networks.’
Telling people to eat better without establishing if there is affordable fresh food available and affordable, and the knowledge for what to do with a box from a farmers’ market, or to walk for half an hour a day without first asking about safe and accessible walking paths, leaves out a very big part of the equation. Assuming people have those structures in place is naïve, and yet that is what is assumed time and time again.
And telling people to not miss screening appointments lest they develop a diabetes complication is perfectly sound advice. Provided there are health professionals available, accessible, and affordable within decent timeframes. It takes only a cursory glance on Twitter to see that people with diabetes have difficulties when it comes to making those important appointments – and, for many, that’s been even worse with COVID.
Individual responsibility goes only so far when there aren’t the social and system structures around to support individuals. And it doesn’t go anywhere when generic messaging is the only messaging employed with the expectation that everyone will respond, and act as directed. Because there’s no time for nuance in a snappy campaign message.
We see time and time again that vulnerable people are disproportionately affected when it comes to health outcomes. In diabetes, we talk about high-risk groups, but what is the point of that if there are no solutions that are targeted for specific cohorts? Plus, if the at-risk messaging is thrown into the mix of the ‘fix yourself’ messaging, it gets very murky. Are people also now meant to be personally responsible for their backgrounds, age, family history…?
Messaging doesn’t only live on the websites and socials of those creating them. There is often a PR machine behind them that does its dark PR arts magic to get the message out there beyond those confines. News outlets pick them up and run, run, run with the messaging, dumbing it down to soundbites that often focus on anything that will get cut through. And often that’s the ‘fix yourself’ messaging.
And of course, the flow on effect of that is more blame, more shame, more stigma, more misinformation, more judgement, more discrimination. More people in the community not familiar and intimately connected with diabetes believing they’ve learnt something new, but really, they’ve probably only added more about how lacking people with diabetes are when it comes to personal responsibility. And on they go to perpetuate the myths about diabetes and personal responsibility.
The times the messaging is right is when people with diabetes are directly involved in developing and finessing it. We can predict the ramifications of messaging gone wrong because we’ve been on the receiving end of it. There’s never not a good time to engage people with diabetes, and I’ll always, always advocate that. It’s good policy because #NothingAboutUsWithoutUs.
But in the case of developing messages about diabetes, engaging people with diabetes can reduce harm to us. And surely that should be the starting (and middle and end) point for anyone doing anything about diabetes.
Diabetogenic 