Today, Australia has a new National Diabetes Strategy. I would be lying to you if I said that I had read every single word of the document (but, hey, knock yourself out and have a read here). I have had a skim. Now, every part of this Strategy is important – of course it is – but today I want to highlight type 1 diabetes in the document.

A lot of the Strategy crosses the boundaries of all types of diabetes, for example in the priority groups such as ATSI peoples, CALD communities, and those living in rural and remote areas. Attention to complications screening, recommending mental health screening at diagnosis as well as including regular monitoring in the Annual Cycle of Care, including diabetes-specific education and training to hospital staff. Services for women with pre-existing (types 1 and 2) diabetes planning and during pregnancy are considered with particular emphasis on pre-pregnancy planning and access to expert education.

While this is understandable – and there are many similarities in the way that these issues are addressed – there does need to be attention to the complexities type 1 diabetes brings. (Equally, the complexities of type 2 need to be tackled!)

But how is type 1 addressed?

Firstly, yay for a concise and accurate definition of type 1 diabetes. In fact, these 50 or so words could be used by any media outlet next time they need to define the condition! Also, well done to Sussan Ley (and her advisors) at this morning’s media briefing for giving such an articulate and well-informed summary of the diabetes situation in Australia.

12246825_10153722947215789_6667088770494981066_nVery pleasingly, early diagnosis of diabetes is one of the key goals (Goal 2), and type 1 diabetes is given its own treatment, including potential areas for action and measures of this progress. The Strategy acknowledges that 20 % of people newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes present to hospital in DKA. This needs to change. Better awareness and recognition of type 1 symptoms to improve early detection are flagged as potential action areas.

Type 1 diabetes in the school setting is mentioned, specifically looking at better supporting families, and children to participate fully and safely at school.

In the piece about transition from adolescent to adult healthcare settings, access to psychological services is emphasised.

Could there be more? Well, of course there could. Diabetes is such a huge issue; there can always be more. So, what would I like to see that hasn’t made the cut?

Well, I would have loved there to be something about diabetes technology, specifically around pathways for approval and access of emerging technologies, as well as sorting out issues with access to currently-available tech.

I would have loved for the early diagnosis topic to be broken down a little more. It’s an issue at all stages, but poses a particularly significant challenge for adults with type 1 who are often misdiagnosed based on their age. It can take a lot of time – and a long period of poor health – before they are correctly diagnosed and treated as necessary.

More attention to structured education programs (such as DAFNE and DESMOND) and their value. And how new programs, such as the valuable POSH program (addressing impaired hypo awareness), could be funded.

Breaking down the section on healthcare access for Australians in rural and remote areas and focus on particular problems faced by those with type 1 in those areas. Specialist diabetes care in these areas is minimal; type 1 specialist care is even harder to find

The same could be said when addressing the management and treatment of type 1 in hospital and aged care setting. Type 1-specific education is essential so we stop hearing people getting lousy treatment.

Of course, this is a high level document and the detail is simply not in there. No dollars have been allocated to the strategy. The devil is in the detail – and we just have to see how that plays out.

Finally, I’m not surprised to say that already the naysayers are out complaining about the Strategy. It’s the usual thing with the usual suspects complaining amongst each other and not offering any suggestions or looking at the positives. I wonder how many of the people complaining actively participated in the consultation stages of the development of the Strategy. I am just stating this here because really, it’s tiresome hearing the same complaints about the same issues. I have some concerns too but I am also willing to acknowledge this as a progress and a step in the right direction.

Happy World Diabetes Day to everyone for tomorrow. Shine a (blue) light on diabetes.