Over the last two days (or last two middles of the night if you’re perpetually in the wrong part of the world as it seems I am), I participated in the excellent first World Health Organisation Global Diabetes Compact Forum. (You can read the Compact which was launched earlier this year here.)
Once again, the WHO team had brought together stakeholders, including diabetes advocates, from across the world to talk about some critically important challenges facing people living with diabetes. These included access to insulin, research and innovation and prevention, health promotion and health literacy. The Forum was definitely not a ‘sit and be lectured to’ event. It was interactive, with everyone having the opportunity to participate and share their experiences and perspectives. The chat function was open and there was a constant stream of engaging, energetic discussion and sharing.
The final session was about prevention and in his introduction, James Elliot, who expertly moderated the event, laid the foundation for the discussion. As with the previous sessions, there were no pre-conceived ideas or narrow focus about the topic.
Prevention isn’t just about prevention of type 2 diabetes. There is a lot of work also going on looking at prevention of type 1 diabetes. And also, once living with diabetes, looking to do what we can to prevent diabetes-related complications.
When I spoke, the first thing I wanted to highlight was the problem I feel with the word prevention, and I revisited previous discussions in which I’ve been involved which highlight the struggle I feel with the word prevention. For too many people it is a word that offers a promise – a promise which guarantees that we can prevent aspects of diabetes that are often well beyond our control. I presented my case for instead focusing on how reducing risk is a far more accurate description of what efforts are truly about, a perspective that I have noticed is being used more and more.
The discussion pivoted to being about complications and associated stigma. Thankfully, this is not the start of the conversation about diabetes-related complications and the way people see them. When I wrote this piece back in 2013, I wrote about the way complications were presented to people with diabetes and how non-modifiable factors such as genetics, are rarely part of the conversation. There seemed to be a very one-dimensional presentation of diabetes-related complications: ‘take care’ of yourself, and you won’t get them.
With communication around complications starting to be included in the language matters movement, I could see that too many people had been told that over-simplistic tale.
It all got taken up a very significant notch when there was a concerted effort in the DOC to encourage dialogue about diabetes-related complications in a non-judgemental and safe way. Suddenly, we were seeing the hashtag #TalkAboutComplications accompany people’s stories, or questions others might have. This led to a real shift, as more and more people shared their experiences, with many saying that it was the first time they had seen others being so open about what was often considered a taboo topic. Starting to peel away the shame and secrecy of what can be a scary part of life with diabetes allowed many people to seek support from peers and help from health professionals.
The legacy of the #TalkAboutComplications idea is that is that there are far more conversations today about diabetes-related complications. There is also a plethora of blog posts, podcasts, journal articles and conference presentations about the topic. I know that there is still significant stigma that we need to chip away at, but actually being able to easily find places online where conversations about complications are normalised and being part of those conversations is contributing to reducing that stigma.
The session at the Global Diabetes Compact Forum was terrific because it tied together diabetes-related complications and stigma. With the theme of access this World Diabetes Day, perhaps we need to think about what that means when it comes to diabetes-related complications. While we absolutely do need to think about all factors at play when it comes to the development of complications, we also need to acknowledge that access is a factor when it comes to outcomes. Access to the right information, including information about risk reduction, access to insulin, access to glucose monitoring devices, access to complications screening, access to early diagnosis and treatment, access to peer support, access to stigma-free treatment, access to mental health support…all these have the very real potential to influence outcomes.
2 comments
Comments feed for this article
November 13, 2021 at 12:28 pm
Rick Phillips
You know I am deeply interested in the issue of complications. Having seen it first hand, I can relate to almost any point of view about the issue. As a person who has seen complications take a serious toll, and after that I have known what complications and the fear of them can mean to a PWD today.
If you see a place, please let me know. Nothing would make my heart more fulfilled to help take the stigma out of complications.
LikeLike
November 15, 2021 at 5:04 pm
Min
I am perplexed about complications, I feel very alone in my complications and yes what do I expect! When we talk about teamwork this is something I have never felt the security of and I am always confused who is in charge of my team? So I see a endocrinologist who seems to be only interested in HbA1c’s and insulin doses which is the least part of my diabetes that I need help with, in fact I am pro at running my daily bsl’s so I go to that doctor just because I feel obliged to. I have neuropathy and retinopathy and bouts of chronic health related anxiety etc etc etc, burnout, I think its called, so for these problems I trek to see specialist, so in the mix of things I see at least 5 different specialists, none of which communicate with each other in any helpful way to me other than ticking the box that they have sent correspondence, is this the teamwork that is always mentioned? That process of sending correspondence is just a click of a email from one doctor to another and then when it reaches its destination it just sits on the computer, does anyone read it, or put my face to it or even care what it says about my terrifying health problems that I am at home suffering in a state of shock and loneliness?. When I see my GP I have to bring up who I have seen and what has happened with those doctors while he/she fumbles over his/her PC trying to extract letters from these specialists when I ask questions about is he/she aware of this regarding my diabetic complications. Its like this is the first time he/she has read them, I always start to frown, in disbelief really. Who is looking after me? I think last time I asked him/her “am I just meant to be at home waiting to die or what, who is meant to be helping me”? I have no clue who is helping me and I seem to be in this teamwork alone because no amount of endless specialists visits handing over hundreds and thousands of dollars has made any impact on my health, I am still at home confused and upset and throwing my hands in the air. I am not sold on the service of “teamwork” when it comes to my diabetic health and it’s a word used a lot about diabetic care, but sorry I’m not feeling it and without a doubt yes I feel judged that my complications were self inflicted and I asked for trouble because I have never in my life had perfect control until the past 2 years with a cgm. So yes 2 years out of 48 I have had a helpful tool to travel with near to normal bsl’s. Teamwork. I don’t think I have ever had the pleasure of such and its a top of the list word used when it comes to diabetic care.
LikeLike