How do you describe diabetes? I vary from ‘an inconvenience’ to ‘an effing pain in the arse’ and lots in between.
I’m all about words. Language is very important to me and I spent a lot of time crafting messages about living with diabetes that balances the ‘this is shit’ component with the ‘this is just life’ side of things.
One of the reasons that getting the language right is actually not so much for the people living with diabetes – we know the details and we know the words we choose to describe it. No; it’s for others. Because when we get the language wrong, we start to open ourselves up. To discrimination, stigmatisation, misinformation and negative perceptions.
It’s for this reason that I refuse to use the word ‘disability’ when talking about MY diabetes. There is much written about and debating ‘is diabetes a disability’ and I am definitely not qualified to really enter this discussion in any other capacity other than ‘this is my opinion’. And my opinion is coming from someone who has 16 years of diabetes under her belt with no significant physical or mental complications because of diabetes.
However, my beautiful, gorgeous friend and neighbour Jo is an expert here, so I called her and yelled ‘help me understand this!’ Jo has type 1 diabetes (believe me – there is a blog somewhere about two people with type 1 living two doors down from each other….) and is a speech pathologist who has worked in the area of disability for a long time. She’s clever, compassionate, direct and doesn’t mess around with words. Jo will hate me for saying this, she has recently been recognised with a nomination for a life-time award for working in the field of disability. She’s more than kind of awesome.
Jo suggested I start by having a look at the World Health Organisation’s definition of disability. This sent me into a world of pain because there were words I simply didn’t understand when put with other words and you know, comprehension.
So, I yelled at her some more (it’s what people do when they don’t understand) and here’s what Jo said that made sense to a fool like me:
JO: Renza (you stupid chicken who may make decent brownies but you’re pretty bloody simple, really). What I’m trying to say is that the social model of disability says the disability doesn’t belong to the person with the condition (that would be considered the disability) – let’s say someone with cerebral palsy, for example. It belongs to the environment. The environment doesn’t allow for the disability to be accommodated. People with diabetes can accommodate themselves – carry or buy sugar if they are low is a basic example of accommodation.
RENZA: So, is it like this? The environment accommodates my particular needs. If I was sitting an exam, I could take time to check my BGL or treat a low or take an extra loo break if necessary. But if I had a condition that didn’t allow me to physically or mentally sit for the three hours required to do the exam or have the capacity to understand the questions being asked then I’d be considered as having a disability?
JO: You’re simple, but yes. Now go make me some brownies.
Of course, diabetes throws all sorts of things into the mix including complications that may result in disability. But for me as diabetes affects me now, there is no reason that I consider the fact that my beta cells decided to shut up shop and move to the tropics as a disability.
I see diabetes as a ‘delayer’ at times. There are times that RIGHT NOW it stops me doing what I want, but this is generally remedied quickly (sometimes, not-so-quickly) and I can do whatever it is I planned to do.
The reality of life is that people face challenges of varying degrees. I’m leaving the last word to the clever Jo who says: Some people have challenges that can relatively easily be overcome and others (perhaps someone with a profound and multiple physical and intellectual disability), can’t live, without considerable effort from their environment to keep them alive, and if they are lucky have some kind of quality of life. It’s all relative!
I’m very interested to hear what others think about this. Where do you stand? Do you have an opinion? Do you consider or refer to your diabetes as a disability?








4 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 9, 2014 at 5:55 am
Carol
Love this post, Renza. Jo explained “disability” so well. I have type1 for years but do not consider that a disability. It is the vision loss (peripheral, ability to see at night, lack of depth perception) due to extensive laser treatments – that is what I consider the “disability”. Some days I don’t want to leave the house, for fear that I will not be able to “keep up” in a fast-paced NY environment without getting hurt. The isolation is the hardest part. I don’t feel “disabled” in my own environment, but when I leave, I do. Thank you for writing on this topic.
LikeLike
May 9, 2014 at 2:00 pm
Jeann
No, my diabetes is not a disability!! At times, it is a damned nuisance and at other times it is just a way of life. However, I consider my husband disabled because he has Rheumatoid Arthritis and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and we definitely have to adapt the environment for him. These conditions do prevent him from leading a ‘normal’ life.
LikeLike
May 19, 2014 at 9:29 am
Sara
(Commenting very late but it got buried in my reader)
The problem with how we view (or don’t view) diabetes as a disability is in the legal aspects – in the US at least.
Diabetes meets the legal definition of a disability. Because of that, we received certain protections under the law – education, job protection, access and accommodations in public areas.
We don’t have to live every day under a huge disability cloud – I know I don’t – but I’m certainly thankful for the protection.
LikeLike
May 19, 2014 at 10:56 pm
RenzaS
Thanks for your comment, Sara. In Australia, people cannot be discriminated against because they have a chronic health condition, so we receive similar protection, just not termed disability. I too am thankful for the protection.
LikeLike